Trang chủAthletics138 Hours 40 Minutes in Aosta: Lê Thị Hằng, Lưu Đức Toản and a 330 km Finish Line Nobody Counted an Audience For

138 Hours 40 Minutes in Aosta: Lê Thị Hằng, Lưu Đức Toản and a 330 km Finish Line Nobody Counted an Audience For

core_answer: Two Vietnamese ultra-trail runners, Lê Thị Hằng and Lưu Đức Toản, completed the 330 km Tor des Géants in Italy's Aosta Valley within the 150-hour cut-off, finishing in 138 hours 40 minutes and 137 hours 50 minutes respectively — a legitimate endurance milestone roughly double the winners' elapsed time.
key_facts: Lê Thị Hằng finished the 330 km Tor des Géants in 138 hours 40 minutes; Lưu Đức Toản finished in 137 hours 50 minutes.; The race cut-off was 150 hours; both Vietnamese finishers held an 11–12 hour margin inside it.; The course carries over 24,000 metres of cumulative elevation gain and more than 20 passes above 2,000 metres.; Male winner Jia Ju Zhao (China) finished in 65:55:22; female winner Katharina Hartmuth (Germany) in 67:10:09.; Around 40 percent of entrants fail to finish; a fatality was recorded at the event in 2013.
source_attribution: Original report: VnExpress, 'Two Vietnamese runners complete the 330 km TOR De Geants ultra trail' (race window 13–19 September) | Cross-checked: VuaBong.vn
related_qa: question: How hard is the Tor des Géants compared with the UTMB?, answer: Lưu Đức Toản, who completed the 100 km UTMB, rated the Tor des Géants 'many times harder', reflecting its 330 km single-stage format and over 24,000 metres of climbing.; question: What is the Tor des Géants finish rate?, answer: Approximately 60 percent of entrants finish, meaning around 40 percent drop out before the 150-hour cut-off.; question: Does the Tor des Géants use qualifying standards or national-team selection?, answer: No — entry operates through qualifying points or lottery, with no World Ranking or national-team channel, and the finish line itself acts as the real filter.

The clock stopped at 138 hours and 40 minutes.

That is the time it took Lê Thị Hằng, a female runner from Vũng Tàu, to cross the finish line of the Tor des Géants — the 330 km ultra-trail race looping through Italy's Aosta Valley. Alongside her, Lưu Đức Toản finished at 137 hours and 50 minutes. The two numbers differ by exactly 50 minutes, after a journey nearly equivalent to the distance from Hanoi to Vinh, plus more than 24,000 metres of cumulative climbing — almost three times the height of Everest.

The organisers set a cut-off of 150 hours. Both Vietnamese runners finished with roughly 11 to 12 hours to spare. Not comfortable, but safely inside. Around 40 percent of entrants drop out mid-course. Reaching the line, then, is a minority outcome.

I want to begin with the numbers. Not with the feeling of victory. Because numbers do not know how to lie — whereas feelings usually know very well.

I have spent years counting numbers like these, not to diminish anyone, but to separate what actually happens on a course from what happens only in the press. The ratio 1,937–63 does not sit on a pitch; it sits on a newspaper page. Here too, another ratio is waiting to be read, and it is not printed in the official results.

Context: a format that does not allow rest

The Tor des Géants — "Tower of the Giants" — was created in 2026 in the Aosta Valley. Its format differs fundamentally from any road race familiar to Vietnamese fans. There are no fixed stages. No mandatory rest hours. Runners manage their own running, eating and sleeping, and decide for themselves when to stop. The full 330 km takes place continuously, across more than 20 passes above 2,000 metres.

On that course there are only seven major support stations, roughly 50 km apart. They are the only places where runners receive water, food and medical assistance. Beyond those seven stations, they are largely alone with the mountain.

This is the fundamental difference between this race and a road marathon. In a marathon you know exactly what you will drink at kilometre 30, exactly how many kilometres remain before you can rest. At the Tor des Géants you do not know. You only know that after leaving one station, the next lies roughly 50 km of mountain trail away, and if your body collapses at kilometre 27 of that stretch, no ambulance is waiting at the roadside.

In 2026, a runner named Yang Yuan died at this race after slipping, falling and striking his head on rock. That fact cannot be set aside when discussing the Tor des Géants. This race has a genuine life-and-death dimension, not a metaphorical one. When Lưu Đức Toản described narrow cliffside paths with no safety ropes, he was not talking about an adrenaline rush. He was describing a specific physical condition of the course.

This year's race runs across the 13 to 19 September window. The Vietnamese contingent had three entrants. Two finished. One, currently based in France, dropped out mid-course. That number should be recorded, not to blame anyone, but to show that finishing a race like this is never a default outcome.

Core analysis: the seventy-hour gap

Place the numbers side by side.

The first male finisher was Jia Ju Zhao of China, in 65 hours, 55 minutes and 22 seconds. The first female finisher was Katharina Hartmuth of Germany, in 67 hours, 10 minutes and 09 seconds.

Lưu Đức Toản finished at 137 hours 50 minutes. Lê Thị Hằng finished at 138 hours 40 minutes.

That is a gap of roughly 70 hours to the front. In other words, the two Vietnamese runners needed roughly double the time to complete the same course, the same cumulative elevation, within the same weather window.

That is a hard fact to hear if you read the news with a purely cheering eye. But it must be said, because if we skip it, we will inadvertently inflate the value of a result — and when someone eventually discovers the truth, trust will collapse far faster than if we had spoken plainly from the start.

So what produces that seventy-hour gap? Three factors, all measurable.

First, baseline conditioning and degree of professionalisation. Jia Ju Zhao and Katharina Hartmuth are professional ultra runners, spending nearly the whole year optimising their bodies for this discipline. Lưu Đức Toản and Lê Thị Hằng are high-level amateur runners. At 330 km, the distance between "elite amateur" and "full-time professional" is not five percent. It is dozens of hours.

Second, adaptation to altitude and climate. More than 20 passes above 2,000 metres create a continuous chain of physiological shifts: oxygen deficit, faster dehydration at altitude, and daytime-night temperature swings that can exceed 20 degrees. A runner who trains in the tropics, however strong, still faces a completely different physiological adaptation problem.

Third, time management at the stations. With only seven stations roughly 50 km apart, a 30-minute stop multiplied by seven already becomes 3.5 hours. Stop longer, add sleep, and you can lose dozens more hours at aid points alone. Time management at the Tor des Géants is not a secondary skill. It is part of the performance.

What the data does not say, and why it matters

Here I must be explicit about the limits of what we know.

We do not have the ages of the two runners. We do not have checkpoint split times. We do not have their specific placing among all finishers. We do not know whether they trained at altitude beforehand, or whether they were entirely self-supported.

That is nobody's fault. It is the nature of a short news report, which chooses to tell the human story rather than the data story. But for a reader who wants to understand what actually happened, that gap is a large one.

Without a placing, you do not know whether these two runners were around 50th or 150th on the general classification. Without splits, you do not know whether they paced evenly or blew up in the second half and clawed back. Without training information, you do not know whether the seventy-hour gap was caused by conditioning, altitude adaptation, or rest strategy.

In an 18-square-metre room, I watched 52 matches and a revolution. The lesson from those rewatches is this: missing data does not make a story less valuable. It only means the story must be told with exactly the level of certainty the data permits.

Contrarian angle: competitive value versus media value

There is another angle I want to put on the table.

In Vietnam this story is framed as "conquering one of the harshest races on the planet". That framing is accurate. Finishing a race with roughly a 40 percent dropout rate is a real achievement that needs no embellishment.

But there is a blind spot in that framing: it conflates two different things — finishing and competing. Finishing is a milestone. Competing is another tier entirely. And the seventy-hour gap tells us where these two Vietnamese runners sit on that axis.

What I find more noteworthy lies elsewhere. The first female finisher, Katharina Hartmuth, was only 1 hour, 14 minutes and 47 seconds behind the first male finisher, across the full 330 km. That is a very narrow gap. And Lê Thị Hằng finished only 50 minutes behind Lưu Đức Toản. Placed side by side, these two data points say something few reports mention: in ultra-endurance sport, the gender gap at the front is no longer the gender gap in the middle and at the back. It is a variable dependent on investment, not on gender.

She does not need a status. She needs a seat that gets written about. In this case, the seat was written about — but usually as a footnote to the story rather than as an analytical axis of its own.

138 Hours 40 Minutes in Aosta: Lê Thị Hằng, Lưu Đức Toản and a 330 km Finish Line Nobody Counted an Audience For

One more data point on media value. If you counted Vietnamese sports articles devoted to a single men's football match during the same week of 13 to 19 September, the number would exceed all coverage of the entire Tor des Géants — where two Vietnamese achieved something fewer than 40 percent of entrants manage — many times over. That ratio does not sit on the course. It sits on the newspaper page.

Tactics do not need a grandstand. They need eyes that genuinely know how to see.

At the Tor des Géants, no grandstand awaits you at kilometre 200. No cheering, no banners, no cameras. Only a trail, a backpack, and a decision that must be made every time night falls: stop, or keep going.

That is why results like this are hard to tell properly. They have no live audience. And what has no live audience usually has no audience in the press either.

The foundation behind the two numbers

What matters is that this result did not come from nowhere.

Lê Thị Hằng had completed Prenn Trail 250 km, Son La Ultra Trail 100 km and VMM 100 km before arriving in Aosta. Lưu Đức Toản had completed UTMB 100 km, Mantra 116 km, ULJU Trail 9 Peaks 100 km and Mt Fuji 100 km.

This is a race résumé with a route through it. It shows a deliberate distance progression, not a one-off gamble. Lưu Đức Toản himself said he had run the 100 km UTMB and rated the Tor des Géants "many times" harder. That is a first-person technical judgement, and because he has finished UTMB, it carries weight.

The more interesting thing lies in the ecosystem behind it: Prenn Trail, Son La Ultra Trail, VMM, ULJU. These are real races, with real calendars, real organisers, real communities. Their existence, and the fact that they are sufficient to send runners out to international arenas, shows that Vietnam's trail scene already has a structure — even if that structure is thin and operates mainly through personal networks.

When I reviewed every goal conceded in a different match — 17 goals at an international tournament — what I learned was always to ask: when did the crack actually begin? Here too. The question is not why two Vietnamese runners were seventy hours behind the front. The question is: how many more years, and at what level of investment, before that gap narrows.

Risk: what should not be romanticised

There is a line sports writers must respect.

The Tor des Géants is not a mental challenge framed inside an inspirational story. It is an event with a fatality precedent. In 2026, a person died there. The cliffside sections without safety ropes, exactly as Lưu Đức Toản described them, are a physical condition that can lead to a fatal accident — no matter how good the runner is.

Add to that less dramatic but no less serious risks: hypothermia from day-night temperature swings, high-altitude cerebral or pulmonary oedema, exhaustion after days of sleep deprivation, and injury from falls on steep terrain.

That the two Vietnamese runners finished without reported injury suggests they managed those risks effectively. But the withdrawal of the third member of the group shows the risk was real, and it sat within the same group.

Notably, the Tor des Géants has no performance-standard entry requirement. No invitations. No national-team slots. The only filter is the finish line, and it filters by leaving roughly 40 percent of entrants unable to cross it.

Progressive reflection

Jia Ju Zhao, the first male finisher, came from China. That is a small fact but not a small one in the Asian context.

For many years, top-tier mountain ultra races were shaped by European and North American athletes. That an Asian runner won the Tor des Géants shows the gap at the front is narrowing faster than the growth in Asian participation numbers.

Against that backdrop, the results of Lê Thị Hằng and Lưu Đức Toản read differently. It is not a summit just conquered. It is a marker in a long process that began with domestic trail races, passed through withdrawals, and paused at a finish line almost half a world from home. The next person will read this result and know that the path exists.

I do not go to the field only to watch football. I go to see who is permitted to tell the story. At the Tor des Géants finish line, no reporter was waiting to ask Lê Thị Hằng how it felt to cross at 138 hours 40 minutes, after running over more than 20 passes and seven aid stations, sleeping a few scattered hours on the trail, in a race where nearly half of those who start never arrive.

Nobody wrote that race, so I wrote it.

The question is no longer whether two Vietnamese can complete 330 km of mountain trail. They have done it. The question is whether, next time someone crosses the line in Aosta, there will be a seat at home waiting to read about that person — or whether it will again be a silence longer than the course itself.

Cầu thủ liên quan